RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBERS: BC-2013- 00611 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Fitness Assessment (FA), dated 6 January 2013, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS). ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The cardio component of her FA was conducted in an area which did not comply with Air Force Instruction. Times and laps were not tracked appropriately which prevented her from passing the cardio component of her FA. She has never failed an FA in 15 years. In support of her appeal, the applicant provides a Memorandum of Record from a meteorological technician and her Individual Fitness Assessment History. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ _ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is currently a member of the Air Force Reserve serving in the grade of master sergeant (E-7). She took a FA on 6 January 2013 scoring a composite score of 74.90, which is an unsatisfactory score. The remaining relevant facts, extracted from the applicant’s military service record, are contained in the evaluation provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial. DPSIM states the applicant did not provide any supporting documentation indicating the run was conducted on an indoor track versus an outdoor track or that the indoor track was unauthorized. Without validation of inappropriate track usage or a request from the commander to remove the FA, they cannot remove the requested FA. The complete DPSIM evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 31 October 2013, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, this office has received no response. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. 4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. ________________________________________________________________ _ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ _ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00611 in Executive Session on 7 January 2014, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered in connection with AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-00611: Exhibit A. DD Forms 149, dated 31 Jan 13, w/atchs. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 18 Sep 13, w/atchs. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Oct 13. Panel Chair 2 3